News Front Page
The current nuclear crisis
Interview with Journal d'Iran
Ali Ansari is Professor of Iranian History, and Director of the Institute of
Iranian Studies at the University of St Andrews.
Journal d’Iran : From 2003, Europe and the Troika have played a leading role in negotiating the
Iranian nuclear issue. Indeed, Europe has chosen the path of diplomacy and dialogue as regards the Iranian nuclear issue. The effectiveness and credibility of such an initiative
is now being questioned, as Iran continues its enrichment activities and negotiation gives no result. We are in a deadlock
situation. If everyone keeps its red line, how can we hope that this eternal negotiation will one day lead to a diplomatic
solution?
Ali Ansari : If the redlines do stick then there can be no diplomatic solution and this becomes a battle of wills. There are two routes, military and economic, and at the moment it would seem that the US/EU are focusing on the economic pressure points. On any fundamental assessment, the US/EU present a stronger and more durable economic bloc.
Journal d’Iran : Regarding the Iranian nuclear issue, Europe has used stick-and-carrot tactics.
Do you think the hardening of the European position and initiatives such as additional sanction outside the UN will change the
current singularity of this long-term relationship?
Ali Ansari : I think the relationship between Europe and Iran changed in 2005 with the accession of Ahmadinejad to the presidency. I don’t think the EU handled its relationship well, but Ahmadinejad’s administration has been far too dismissive of the Europeans and effectively over time pushed them into a more flexible American camp. In terms of diplomacy, this has to my mind been a singular failure of Iranian foreign policy. Prior to this they had always, relatively successfully managed to keep the EU separate from the US. With the possibility of an Obama victory in November this EU/US union of minds becomes even tighter.
Read the interview













